« previous next »
Pages:  1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD  (Read 34823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bovic32

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #30 on: September 27, 2011, 12:35:42 AM »
Zobex is 100% correct, no need to argue each one's ideas here,this forum are open in YT ideas,we are here to gather info about YT,no need to argue.
Logged

bovic32

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #31 on: September 27, 2011, 02:39:16 AM »
Bro NS,
 Can you identify the counter bearing of the area?
 Thanks and more power....
Logged

Offline admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
    • Southeast Asia Maritime Foundation
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #32 on: September 27, 2011, 07:14:28 AM »
Quote from: NORTHSTAR on September 26, 2011, 09:02:22 PM
TH44

Now. take a look at this illustration so that you will see and evaluate  yourself.  Check the magnetic declination between magnetic north and true north. It's very exact and precise. Hehehe ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

First illustration map is the original position of the Google earth

2nd illustration is the magnetic declination between true north and magnetic north

3rd illustration is the twisted map to get the exact position of the magnetic north

I don't really get it because this time you have rotated your drawing towards NORTHEAST whereby on your original you had rotated it towards NORTHWEST. Please explain why there's two completely opposite rotations going on there?
TW
Logged

bovic32

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #33 on: September 27, 2011, 11:42:50 PM »
Thanks for the info TH44
Logged

t_hunter44

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2011, 02:21:19 PM »
Bovic, here is the Declination of your site again, I had to re-post it. If you ask me, who really cares about declination when it is so minimal, unless one is talking about great distances but whatever, if one can locate the exact location of the cache by it, more power to him.

Logged

Offline NORTHSTAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #35 on: September 29, 2011, 06:43:48 AM »
Quote from: bovic32 on September 27, 2011, 02:39:16 AM
Bro NS,
 Can you identify the counter bearing of the area?
 Thanks and more power....

Bovic
Maybe this is the counter bearing you are asking for. Try to find marker on the yellow dot I presented to complete the isometric pattern in your treasure site. Look at the two presentation below
Logged

DINDO BAYAUA

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2011, 07:14:36 AM »
That is not counter bearing, that is geometrical symmetry (Math 301 - Plain and spherical geometry). Try again...
Logged

DINDO BAYAUA

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2011, 07:47:18 AM »
Better know what is meant by counter bearing (backward bearing) before assuming to much. That assumption leads to ES.
Logged

Offline NORTHSTAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2011, 07:50:32 AM »
Quote from: DINDO BAYAUA on September 29, 2011, 07:14:36 AM
That is not counter bearing, that is geometrical symmetry (Math 301 - Plain and spherical geometry). Try again...

Then twist the map into south direction
Logged

DINDO BAYAUA

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #39 on: September 29, 2011, 07:59:13 AM »
You again assumed that ES is South-East?  :D :D :D Wrong. That ES is an engineering lingo which means "ENGINEERING STUPIDITY".
Logged

Offline NORTHSTAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2011, 08:07:03 AM »
Quote from: DINDO BAYAUA on September 29, 2011, 07:59:13 AM
You again assumed that ES is South-East?  :D :D :D Wrong. That ES is an engineering lingo which means "ENGINEERING STUPIDITY".

Hehehe. I did'nt reply on your ES topic but on the backward bearing. See, if who is stupid now. Jejeje ??? ??? ???. It's like putting a trap for yourself. That's the most stupid among all the stupids. Hahahahaha ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged

DINDO BAYAUA

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #41 on: September 29, 2011, 08:12:52 AM »
He-he-he, the most stupid thing I ever read is making the "Backward Bearing" interpreted as PROJECTION. :D :D :D. Even your so called Isometric method is definitely stupid since Isometry is 3 sided solid projection while you were projecting in a plain format.  :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Who do you think has more credibility here Professor?
Logged

Offline NORTHSTAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 818
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #42 on: September 29, 2011, 08:21:01 AM »
Quote from: DINDO BAYAUA on September 29, 2011, 08:12:52 AM
He-he-he, the most stupid thing I ever read is making the "Backward Bearing" interpreted as PROJECTION. :D :D :D. Even your so called Isometric method is definitely stupid since Isometry is 3 sided solid projection while you were projecting in a plain format.  :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Who do you think has more credibility here Professor?

Ha????????????????  Isometry means 3 sided solid projection???? Where in the world did you get that definition..
Better go back to your school and ask your professor. Maybe you are sleeping while your saliva is drooping in your cheek during the lecture. Hahahahaha ;D ;D ;D
Logged

bovic32

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #43 on: September 29, 2011, 10:10:57 AM »
Bro NS,
 I dont mean anything,I gather info here so I consider also your ideas.And many thanks for your effort in the subject
Logged

t_hunter44

  • Guest
Re: PLS EVALUATE MY SITE IN YOUR METHOD
« Reply #44 on: September 29, 2011, 08:06:26 PM »
Quote from: DINDO BAYAUA on September 29, 2011, 08:12:52 AM
He-he-he, the most stupid thing I ever read is making the "Backward Bearing" interpreted as PROJECTION. :D :D :D. Even your so called Isometric method is definitely stupid since Isometry is 3 sided solid projection while you were projecting in a plain format.  :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Who do you think has more credibility here Professor?
Between DB and NS, why not post your Credentials here, ie; Diploma and that would settle it once and for all. I took up BSME Engineering Drawing 101 way way back and as far as I can remember with my 3rd grade mentality, Isometric Drawing projection always start with a 3 dimensional object like DB said and I agree and anybody here can search for the truth in the internet but NS can do Isometrics on a single dimension, let us wait for him to show his credentials and DB I am sure is willing to show his. Is that fair or is that unfair?
Logged
Pages:  1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »